- Add a basic problem matcher for illuaminate errors.
- Add a script (tools/parse-reports.py) which parses the XML reports
generated by checkstyle and junit, extracts source locations, and
emits them in a manner which can be consumed by another set of
matchers.
This should make it a little easier to see problems for folks who just
rely on CI to test things (though also, please don't do this if you can
help it).
This uses pre-commit [1] to check patches are well formed and run
several linters on them. We currently do some boring things (check files
are syntactically valid) as well as some project-specific ones:
- Run illuaminate on the Lua files
- Run checkstyle on Java
[1]: https://pre-commit.com/
illuaminate does not handle Java files, for obvious reasons. In order to
get around that, we have a series of stub files within /doc/stub which
mirrored the Java ones. While this works, it has a few problems:
- The link to source code does not work - it just links to the stub
file.
- There's no guarantee that documentation remains consistent with the
Java code. This change found several methods which were incorrectly
documented beforehand.
We now replace this with a custom Java doclet[1], which extracts doc
comments from @LuaFunction annotated methods and generates stub-files
from them. These also contain a @source annotation, which allows us to
correctly link them back to the original Java code.
There's some issues with this which have yet to be fixed. However, I
don't think any of them are major blockers right now:
- The custom doclet relies on Java 9 - I think it's /technically/
possible to do this on Java 8, but the API is significantly uglier.
This means that we need to run javadoc on a separate JVM.
This is possible, and it works locally and on CI, but is definitely
not a nice approach.
- illuaminate now requires the doc stubs to be generated in order for
the linter to pass, which does make running the linter locally much
harder (especially given the above bullet point).
We could notionally include the generated stubs (or at least a cut
down version of them) in the repo, but I'm not 100% sure about that.
[1]: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/jdk/javadoc/doclet/package-summary.html
This registers IPeripheral as a capability. As a result, all (Minecraft
facing) functionality operates using LazyOptional<_>s instead.
Peripheral providers should now return a LazyOptional<IPeripheral> too.
Hopefully this will allow custom peripherals to mark themselves as
invalid (say, because a dependency has changed).
While peripheral providers are somewhat redundant, they still have their
usages. If a peripheral is applied to a large number of blocks (for
instance, all inventories) then using capabilities does incur some
memory overhead.
We also make the following changes based on the above:
- Remove the default implementation for IWiredElement, migrating the
definition to a common "Capabilities" class.
- Remove IPeripheralTile - we'll exclusively use capabilities now.
Absurdly this is the most complex change, as all TEs needed to be
migrated too.
I'm not 100% sure of the correctness of this changes so far - I've
tested it pretty well, but blocks with more complex peripheral logic
(wired/wireless modems and turtles) are still a little messy.
- Remove the "command block" peripheral provider, attaching a
capability instead.
Most of the port is pretty simple. The main problems are regarding
changes to Minecraft's rendering system.
- Remove several rendering tweaks until Forge's compatibility it
brought up-to-date
- Map rendering for pocket computers and printouts
- Item frame rendering for printouts
- Custom block outlines for monitors and cables/wired modems
- Custom breaking progress for cables/wired modems
- Turtle "Dinnerbone" rendering is currently broken, as normals are not
correctly transformed.
- Rewrite FixedWidthFontRenderer to to the buffer in a single sweep.
In order to do this, the term_font now also bundles a "background"
section, which is just a blank region of the screen.
- Render monitors using a VBO instead of a call list. I haven't
compared performance yet, but it manages to render a 6x5 array of
_static_ monitors at almost 60fps, which seems pretty reasonable.
- Adds a CheckStyle configuration which is pretty similar to CC's
existing one.
- Add the Gradle license plugin.
- Ensure the existing source code is compatible with these additional
checks.
See #239
Jonathan Coates