Closes#293. Doesn't really solve anything there aside from exposing the
number, but sadly there's not really anything obvious I can do on my end
- the command API just doesn't expose anything else.
It appears several mods inject their own drops on the LOWEST priority,
meaning that we capture the existing drops, and the other mod will clear
the (now empty) drop list and add its own, resulting in dupe bugs.
While I'd argue it's somewhat dubious doing this on the LOWEST priority,
it's not a battle I'm prepared to fight. For now, we just remove the
block/entity drop handlers, and handle all drop logic when entities are
spawned.
Fixes#288
This is equally an ugly hack, but means we're at least not constructing
entities with null worlds any more.
Ideally we could always use the turtle entity, but this will require a
bit more of a refactor.
Fixes#265
- Add Forge's "name" field to the loot tables. This doesn't resolve all
our missing loot providers, but it's a start.
- Add back GUIs for pocket computers, printouts, view computer, etc...
So very little works, but it compiles and runs.
Things to resolve over the next few days:
- Horrible mappings (should largely be resolved by tomorrow).
- Cannot send extra data over containers - we'll have to see what Forge
does here.
- Turtle models are broken
- No block drops yet - this will largely be cherry-picking whatever I
did on Fabric.
- Weird inventory desyncs (items don't show up initially when
interacting with a CC inventory).
- Probably lots of other things.
- Adds a CheckStyle configuration which is pretty similar to CC's
existing one.
- Add the Gradle license plugin.
- Ensure the existing source code is compatible with these additional
checks.
See #239
This only renders the bounding box on non-screen edges of the monitor,
meaning you have an uninterrupted view of the screen when hovering
hover.
Closes#219
This uses the same behaviour that repeaters and comparators do for
determining their input, meaning that redstone directly connected to the
computer is read (as you would expect).
It's worth noting that this is a shift from previous behaviour.
Therefore, it runs the (small) risk of breaking existing builds.
However, I believe it is more consistent with the expected behaviour.
