osmarks/documentation
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Edit ‘wrong’

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
osmarks 2024-07-12 07:55:45 +00:00 committed by wikimind
parent 204c07ece1
commit 96ff7082d8
1 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
wrong.myco
View File

@ -4,14 +4,19 @@ Due to technical limitations, this page is not currently aware of the particular
* The claim you just made is contradicted by decades of research which you ignored because it does not feel good.
* Your statement is an incoherent jumble of vaguely associated technical terms which does not actually parse into a claim.
* Your reasoning is based on a roughly accurate intuition or approximation which doesn't generalize to the edge case you just used it in.
* The claim you just made is inconsistent with my reading of an obscure paper I happened to see.
* Your argument could only be generated by someone with deep and abiding misunderstandings of physics, maths, reality, etc.
* Your argument only works by word association and equivocation.
* If the claim you made were true, you could easily print money, and you haven't.
* You made a minor grammar error and are thus scheduled for obliteration.
* Your argument relates poorly defined terms in a way which makes no concrete predictions.
* [[gwern]] once offhandedly claimed the opposite.
* Your answer is right, but only because your mistakes didn't fail to cancel out.
* Your values are evidently antithetical to my own and you will need to be paperclipped in time.
* The claim you just made is contradicted by thinking about it for five seconds and basic domain knowledge.
* You uncritically repeated a piece of technical marketing which makes impossible or wildly implausible claims.
* You are trying to solve the wrong problem using the wrong methods based on a wrong model of the world derived from poor thinking and unfortunately all of your mistakes have failed to cancel out.
* A brief Fermi estimate shows that your answer is most likely off by several orders of magnitude.
* A brief Fermi estimate shows that your answer is most likely off by several orders of magnitude.
* The evidence for your claim is based on problematic evaluations, standards or methods of measurement and you have not sufficiently justified them.
* Most arguments are wrong. You made an argument. Therefore, it's probably wrong.