From 96ff7082d8ad467a2705324f2af84cbdb09c8a54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: osmarks Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 07:55:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Edit=20=E2=80=98wrong=E2=80=99?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- wrong.myco | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/wrong.myco b/wrong.myco index fda88ff..2d07f6a 100644 --- a/wrong.myco +++ b/wrong.myco @@ -4,14 +4,19 @@ Due to technical limitations, this page is not currently aware of the particular * The claim you just made is contradicted by decades of research which you ignored because it does not feel good. * Your statement is an incoherent jumble of vaguely associated technical terms which does not actually parse into a claim. +* Your reasoning is based on a roughly accurate intuition or approximation which doesn't generalize to the edge case you just used it in. * The claim you just made is inconsistent with my reading of an obscure paper I happened to see. +* Your argument could only be generated by someone with deep and abiding misunderstandings of physics, maths, reality, etc. * Your argument only works by word association and equivocation. * If the claim you made were true, you could easily print money, and you haven't. * You made a minor grammar error and are thus scheduled for obliteration. * Your argument relates poorly defined terms in a way which makes no concrete predictions. * [[gwern]] once offhandedly claimed the opposite. * Your answer is right, but only because your mistakes didn't fail to cancel out. +* Your values are evidently antithetical to my own and you will need to be paperclipped in time. * The claim you just made is contradicted by thinking about it for five seconds and basic domain knowledge. * You uncritically repeated a piece of technical marketing which makes impossible or wildly implausible claims. * You are trying to solve the wrong problem using the wrong methods based on a wrong model of the world derived from poor thinking and unfortunately all of your mistakes have failed to cancel out. -* A brief Fermi estimate shows that your answer is most likely off by several orders of magnitude. \ No newline at end of file +* A brief Fermi estimate shows that your answer is most likely off by several orders of magnitude. +* The evidence for your claim is based on problematic evaluations, standards or methods of measurement and you have not sufficiently justified them. +* Most arguments are wrong. You made an argument. Therefore, it's probably wrong. \ No newline at end of file