Previously the shadow was to the bottom right. When tiddlers overlap
(as with the stacked storyview) it makes them “pop” more if the shadow
extends round all sides of the tiddler.
Firefox bugs with position:sticky mean that we probably shouldn’t have
sticky titles turned on by default.
Previously, sticky titles were packaged into a pluggable theme. Now, I
think it may make more sense to make the sticky titles status be a
theme tweak for the Vanilla theme.
By turning the tiddler frame into a link it is now possible to click on
a tiddler to navigate to it. This is needed for the new
stacked-storyview, but it also useful in other storyviews.
Note that there are currently some issues. For example, in classic
storyview, clicking on a tiddler will scroll to the top of it, which
isn’t helpful if you’ve scrolled halfway down a long tiddler.
This is just an idea really.
The help plugin is only included in the tw5.com wiki; the idea is to
also include it in the empty.html wiki, either as a plugin or as part
of the core.
If it stays as a plugin, the idea would be to have different help
plugins for different languages.
tv-get-export-path tells render tiddlers where to export files
tv-get-export-image-link tells images.js where to look for images
tv-get-export-link tells tells link.js where to look for links to other
exported tiddlers
@aelocson here’s an alternative fix for #981, as discussed in
https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/commit/691e5719a4ff74a04d389bd1
26ba2a69e7651a2a#commitcomment-9848682
It does seem a lot nicer. It avoids the problem you raised, and also
avoids scrolling when a permalink is used.
I suspect that we’d need to make the hard-coded 50 pixels be
configurable.
This reverts commit b2b8006b58, reversing
changes made to e7e16137b2.
@welford my apologies it turns out there are a couple of problems, I’ll
comment more on the pull request
Previous changes since 5.1.7 broke the documented semantics by no
longer returning true when the versions match. It affected the upgrade
process, making it impossible to upgrade to a later pre-release (ie
where the version numbers in the upgrade.html match those in the file
being upgraded).
Also reviewed and updated the calls to checkVersions.
@felixhayashi I think that this effectively reverts the change you
original submitted. Are you OK with it?
