Instead of using ids for each computer each computer is spawned with id
0 but has a label which matches up to its test name. This has several
advantages:
- No more confusing IDs: the test code now just does thenComputerOk()
and that's it - the computer to track is inferred from the test name.
- All files are stored on one computer, which means we can write code
which is shared between tests.
This spins up a Minecraft instance (much like we do for the server) and
instructs the client to take screenshots at particular times. We then
compare those screenshots and assert they match (modulo some small
delta).
Basically mimic the actual API that Minecraft would expose if the
methods hadn't been stripped. Lots of ATs and unsafe hacks to get this
working, but thankfully the API we can expose to the user is pretty
nice. Yay for Kotlin?
Anyway, will cause some immediate pain (yay merge conflicts) but should
make keeping the two in sync much easier.
These are still equivalent to the official mappings but also include
method names and javadoc. Yay!
A bit weird to be on versioned mappings after 8 months of MojMap :).!
- Use linear attenuation.
- Fix speakers being 16 times as loud as they should be. They correctly
cut off at the right distance, but didn't fade out as one might
expect.
- Clamp volume at 0, not 1. Fixes#892
It's probably the lowest traffic module :p.
Also (somewhat) improve the deprecated messages in os.loadAPI. We really
need a proper article on require and converting from os.loadAPI.
Plan here is to release 1.98 for 1.16.x and 1.17.x and 1.97.1 for
1.15.x. However, will let this sit for a few days while I sort out 1.98
and the 1.17 port just in case any more bugs pop up.
This uses Netty's global traffic shaping handlers to limit the rate at
which packets can be sent and received. If the bandwidth limit is hit,
we'll start dropping packets, which will mean remote servers send
traffic to us at a much slower pace.
This isn't perfect, as there is only a global limit, and not a
per-computer one. As a result, its possible for one computer to use
all/most bandwidth, and thus slow down other computers.
This would be something to improve on in the future. However, I've spent
a lot of time reading the netty source code and docs, and the
implementation for that is significantly more complex, and one I'm not
comfortable working on right now.
For the time being, this satisfies the issues in #33 and hopefully
alleviates server owner's concerns about the http API. Remaining
problems can either be solved by moderation (with help of the
//computercraft track` command) or future updates.
Closes#33
Also add a test for rednet message sending. Hopefully gives some of the
modem and networking code a little bit of coverage (which is clearly the
same as being right :p).
Jonathan Coates