To download and tokenize the [openwebtext](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openwebtext) dataset. It will create a `train.bin` and `val.bin` which holds the GPT2 BPE token ids in a massive sequence. Then we're ready to kick off training. The training script currently tries to reproduce the smallest GPT-2 released by OpenAI, i.e. the 124M version of GPT-2. We can run it like so:
Training on 1 GPU overnight currently gets loss ~3.74. Random chance at init is -ln(1/50257) = 10.82. Which brings us to baselines.
## baselines
OpenAI GPT-2 checkpoints allow us to get some baselines in place for openwebtext. We can get the numbers as follows:
```
$ python train.py eval_gpt2
$ python train.py eval_gpt2_medium
$ python train.py eval_gpt2_large
$ python train.py eval_gpt2_xl
```
and observe the following losses on train and val:
| model | params | train loss | val loss |
| ------| ------ | ---------- | -------- |
| gpt2 | 124M | 3.11 | 3.12 |
| gpt2-medium | 350M | 2.85 | 2.84 |
| gpt2-large | 774M | 2.66 | 2.67 |
| gpt2-xl | 1558M | 2.56 | 2.54 |
I briefly tried finetuning gpt2 a bit more on our OWT and didn't notice dramatic improvements, suggesting that OWT is not much much different from WT in terms of the data distribution, but this needs a bit more thorough attempt once the code is in a better place.
For model benchmarking `bench.py` might be useful. It's identical what happens in the meat of the training loop of `train.py`, but omits much of the other complexities.