2.9 KiB
Boilerplate in Mycorrhiza codebase
Being programmed by Go, mostly by Bouncepaw, the codebase contains a lot of boilerplate. This document is an attempt to describe how it is done.
Modules
Mycorrhiza is arranged in quite many packages. They are thematic. For example, package backlinks
has all things backlinks, including the storage, the views, and exported functions (not many, ideally). Such packages can be called modules, if you want.
Views
Views are the biggest source of similar code. Before the transition from QTPL to Go's standard templates, this boilerplate energy was split differently, but was not instantly obvious. The current approach does not really introduce new boilerplate energy, but it does focus it, resulting in actual boilerplate. I hope you get the idea.
All related views are part of one module.
Views come in multiple parts.
The first part is the template itself. Call template files like that: view_user_list.html
, prefixed with view_
. The boilerplate is as follows.
{{define "title"}}{{end}}
{{define "body"}}
{{end}}
More often than not, you will want to make template title
a different template in the same file. See existing files for inspiration.
The code that makes those templates runnable lies in one file. This is the second part. It contains the following:.
The Russian translation is a string
variable called ruTranslation
; we currently have no other translations, but they are to be called like frTranslation
, eoTranslation
, et cetera.
var (
ruTranslation = `
{{define "one thing"}}...{{end}}
{{define "other thing"}}...{{end}}
`
...
)
Chains are collection of different language variants of the same template. Declare them and then assign them in a function, which you call somewhere (not just init
!).
var (
ruTranslation = `...`
chainStuff, chainAddStuff viewutil.Chain
)
func initViews() {
chainStuff = viewutil.CopyEnRuWith(fs, "view_stuff.html", ruTranslation)
chainAddStuff = viewutil.CopyEnRuWith(fs, "view_add_stuff.html", ruTranslation)
}
Then every view has a runner and its own datatype.
//...
type dataStuff struct {
*viewutil.BaseData
StuffName string
}
func viewStuff(meta viewutil.Meta, stuffName string) {
viewutil.ExecutePage(meta, chainStuff, dataUserList{
BaseData: &viewutil.BaseData{},
StuffName: stuffName,
})
}
Sometimes, two datatypes of different views are the same, it is ok to just share one, but name it so that it mentions both.
Avoid any logic in those runners. Keep them as boilerplate as they are. You rarely need to fill the BaseData
field. Do it if you need to. If you don't, viewutil.ExecutePage
will do its best to guess. We name the fields with capital letters.
Troubleshooting
- Declared the chains?
- Assigned the chains?
- Assigned the chains, sure?
- Used the correct data type?
*viewutil.BaseData
is there?- Used the correct chain?