For some reason this is causing the focus to be repeatedly set to
the title field when editing a tiddler's text. Let's revert it for
now.
See Issue #1527.
This reverts commit fdc635007b.
With this enhancement, clicking on a tiddler in the story view will
navigate to that tiddler. This is needed for eg the stacked storyview,
where we want to be able to click on tiddlers to bring them to the
front of the stack.
There are some problems though - as things stand, clicking on a tiddler
in classic storyview will scroll to the top of that tiddler.
@tobibeer I think that this was originally from you. I think it’s
problematic listing all available tiddlers for performance and
usability reasons.
I’ve instead taken advantage of your work to template the tag links by
splitting the system and non-system tags. What do you think?
Fixes#1450
Provides support for an integrated plugin library that can be used to
install plugins from tiddlywiki.com directly to wikis hosted online or
offline. See the Plugins tab of Control Panel.
Todo:
* Error checking(eg libraryserver.js HTTP GET)
* Translatability
* Documentation
** $:/tags/ServerConnection
** savelibrarytiddlers command
for now, computes path to backup directory, appending the relative path
of UploadBackupDir to the absolute one from the UploadURL
Also added example for store.php to hint
fixes#1333
extracts the tag-link into a component template...
**$:/core/ui/Components/tag-link**
...so as to split the list in two, having two filters that list tiddlers
in the add-tags popup to...
1. firstly, list matching used tags
2. secondly, list mathcing tiddler titles, thus availabe for tagging
Does away with searching content as it is irrelevant if not distracting
for tagging.
Why two lists? Consider wanting to tag a tiddler with "Filters"...
observe how the result would otherwise be way too far down because
existing tiddler titles get in the way.
Component templates are also desireable elsewhere, e.g. #1318
In 5.1.5 we switched to using `<$action-setfield>` instead of
`<$fieldmangler>`. The problem was that in the process we lost the
validation of field names, making it possible to create fields with
illegal names
Fixes#1186
Note: I did NOT test the results as I have yet to figure out how to make
node.js...
* actually run the server without a 403
* build the core tw after me having made changes
* removed trailing whitespaces in button tids
* defined a global left margin for buttons set to 5px
* slightly less than in view-mode before
* slightly more than in edit-mode before
* but visually more appealing to me
* leaves a wee more room for the title to unfold
New export button appears as a page control toolbar button, a tiddler
toolbar button, and a button in the advanced search filter tab.
Initially supports exporting as static HTML, CSV, JSON or `.tid` file.
Still to do:
* Made the exporter descriptions translatable
* Hide the export button by default
* User docs
* Cleaning up the existing templates (eg,
`$:/core/templates/alltiddlers.template.html` should work by
transcluding `$:/core/templates/exporters/Static`)
* Docs for the new macros `exportButton`, `csvtiddlers` and
`jsontiddlers`
Issues:
* OS X Numbers refuses to open CSV files that have been generated in
Chrome, because it thinks they’ve been downloaded from the Internet.
Firefox works OK
* The export button won’t work within the tiddler info panel, or from
the *more* popup (this is because we don’t support nested popups)
With this commit tag pills will now choose for the foreground colour
either the current palette “foreground” or “background” colours,
according to which has the higher contrast. It’s something @gernert has
expressed an interest in in the past, and I’ve tended to agree that it
is a nice piece of polish. It opens up the possibility of paler colours
for tag pills than are currently possible.
The trouble is that in order to implement it I’ve had to bring in a
third party library for parsing CSS colours. It weighs in just over
9KB, making quite a lot of weight for such a small feature. I don’t see
any other immediate uses for the colour parsing library either.
So, I’m undecided at the moment whether this should stay in the core.
Clicking on the advanced search ellipsis when there is a search string
will open the advanced search tiddler, and copy the current search term
to it.
Thanks to @Spangenhelm for the idea.
Also fixes a problem pointed out by @Evolena whereby the advanced
search counts hadn’t been adjusted to remove `$:/temp/advancedsearch`
from the search.
Reasons:
- can show or hide the button text with CSS (assuming
tv-config-toolbar-text is yes).
- can have different looking buttons in the page controls versus the
view toolbar, etc
- more flexibility styling the button appearance, for example you
can change the text size compared to the icon size
- button appearance is more themeable
It seems that there is a broader problem with the way that the button
is embedded within the label of a checkbox; even on Chrome it meant
that the checkbox active state was triggered when clicking on any of
the buttons. The user experience was in any case confusing; it wasn’t
obvious that clicking on the label to the right of the button would
flick the checkbox.
The solution takes the buttons and labels out of the checkbox label.
The journal tiddler will be tagged with the name of the current
tiddler. This is similar to how the new here button works.
(Would have liked to reuse the journalButton code which is almost
identical between new-journal-here and new-journal, but I'm not
sure how to do it.)
This is a basic “new here” tiddler toolbar button that just creates a
new tiddler tagged with the title of the current tiddler.
@pmario is there anything else required?
The problem was that stylesheets were being transcluded in inline mode
(rather than block mode), which meant that triple backticks were not
being interpreted as block mode markup, but rather as a series of
single backticks.
The control panel isn’t the right place for tools; it’s a place for
settings and internal configuration.
Once again apologies to the translators for wiping out your hard work!
