If the target tiddler of the draft is missing (as happens after
clicking “new tiddler”), then we count the draft as modified if the
text is not empty.
Also we count the the draft as modified if the draft title has been
changed
@felixhayashi I’m afraid I haven’t used your pull request as there were
a few details that I wanted to do differently. The main change is that
these changes allow both a param string and hashmap to be specified.
In 5.1.3 we introduced the idea that the `event.param` variable could
optionally be a hashmap, allowing multiple values to be passed with the
message.
This change moves the hashmap to a separate `event.paramObject`
variable, allowing us to pass both a hashmap and a param string.
The “info”, “edit”, “close” troika has been a feature of TW5 since the
very early days. Recent discussion in Hangout #67 has made me question
whether we wouldn’t be better off with the defaults in this commit:
“more”, “edit”, “close”.
The rationale is that the primary purpose of the “info” button has
become gaining access to the tools that haven’t been elevated to being
toolbar buttons. Most of the rest of the content of the info panel is
pretty arcane. So let’s try it for a few days - I’d appreciate any
feedback.
With this commit tag pills will now choose for the foreground colour
either the current palette “foreground” or “background” colours,
according to which has the higher contrast. It’s something @gernert has
expressed an interest in in the past, and I’ve tended to agree that it
is a nice piece of polish. It opens up the possibility of paler colours
for tag pills than are currently possible.
The trouble is that in order to implement it I’ve had to bring in a
third party library for parsing CSS colours. It weighs in just over
9KB, making quite a lot of weight for such a small feature. I don’t see
any other immediate uses for the colour parsing library either.
So, I’m undecided at the moment whether this should stay in the core.
Dragging a tiddler link into a tiddler editor, or outside the browser
into another app, will now add double square brackets around the title
if it includes spaces. Suggested by @tgirod.
I’m not 100% sure about this change. It breaks one habit that I had
developed: typing `[[sometext|]]` and then dragging a title in between
the vertical bar and the first closing square bracket. What do others
think?
Clicking on the advanced search ellipsis when there is a search string
will open the advanced search tiddler, and copy the current search term
to it.
Thanks to @Spangenhelm for the idea.
Also added a “description” field for wiki folders.
Right now there’s too many editions listed. I think we should by
default only list editions whose `tiddlywiki.info` file has
`showInListings` set to `true`, and have an `--editions all` command
that lists everything.
@pmario please could you check that the editions in your
`TIDDLYWIKI_EDITION_PATH` are correctly listed?
Also fixes a problem pointed out by @Evolena whereby the advanced
search counts hadn’t been adjusted to remove `$:/temp/advancedsearch`
from the search.
Reasons:
- can show or hide the button text with CSS (assuming
tv-config-toolbar-text is yes).
- can have different looking buttons in the page controls versus the
view toolbar, etc
- more flexibility styling the button appearance, for example you
can change the text size compared to the icon size
- button appearance is more themeable
It seems that there is a broader problem with the way that the button
is embedded within the label of a checkbox; even on Chrome it meant
that the checkbox active state was triggered when clicking on any of
the buttons. The user experience was in any case confusing; it wasn’t
obvious that clicking on the label to the right of the button would
flick the checkbox.
The solution takes the buttons and labels out of the checkbox label.
Resolves some inconsistencies over the behaviour of the new tiddler
message under various circumstances.
“new journal here” when a journal for today already exists now brings
up the existing journal for editing, and adds the required tag.
I’d be very grateful for any testing of the behaviour here: try using
new tiddler, clone tiddler, new here, new journal here, and new journal
in various combinations (eg with the draft not existing, already
existing, open or closed etc), and let me know of any peculiarities.
