We can now pass arrays of rule classes to the parser constructor, overriding the rules that would normally be used by the parser.
This allows us to create custom variants of the wikitext parser with their own content type.
It could also provide a basis for a new Markdown parser based on our existing wikitext parser but with new rules.
* wikirules now use better macrocall parser
Before, wikirules would use a deficient macrocall parser which couldn't
handle certain types of arguments. Now it uses the same one that the
widget parser uses. Less code!
* style changes and removing weird switch statement
That switch statement made more sense in an earlier iteration.
* comment improvements
* oops, wikirule macrocalls could do ONE thing better
* '=' wasn't allowed for widget macros, but why?
Now they're allowed for both widget macros and macrocall macros.
This fixes a problem introduced in
c7b31b0242.
The changes by @tobibeer inadvertently made the regular expression
evaluation significantly more expensive because of lookahead. The is
less elegant but reverts the performance problem.
* Ignore parser rule configuration in safe mode
* Made text translatable
* Added new setting for camelcase links
* Added warning on parser rule configuration tab
See #1875
I switched this optimisation off back in
ed35d91be6, in October 2013, as part of a
big refactoring of the parsing and widget mechanism. I’ve been meaning
to switch it back on for some time.
My rough measurements suggest that this optimisation can reduce
rendering time by 5-10%.
Ok, I think I've got it now. The following matches all...
1. starting with a literal `$:`
2. then any number of character not a whitespace, `<` or `|`
3. closing with anything that is, again, not a whitespace, `<` or `|`
Test here...
http://tbdemo.tiddlyspot.com/#Autolink%20System%20Tiddlers
enhanced extlink parser to cover system tiddler links
of course, only those without spaces in their title
didn't want to open up an extra parser for this as extlink has all the
basics
There are still some warnings about making functions in a loop, but
I’ll fix those as a separate pull request because the fixes are more
than typographic errors.
@pmario and @welford - I’m not presenting this as a fix for #717
because I’m still not in a position to reproduce it.
However, I found this during a review of newline handling code, and
would be interested if it is implicated in the problems you are
reporting.
