1
0
mirror of https://github.com/osmarks/nanogpt-experiments.git synced 2024-09-21 03:39:44 +00:00
nanogpt-experiments/README.md

64 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2022-12-28 00:58:19 +00:00
# nanoGPT
The cleanest, fastest repository for training/finetuning medium-sized GPTs.
This repo currently requires reading the code, but it's not that bad. work ongoing...
Getting started:
We need a few dependencies:
- [pytorch](https://pytorch.org), of course
- numpy
- `pip install datasets` for huggingface datasets
- `pip install tiktoken` for OpenAI's fast bpe code
- `pip install wandb` for optional logging
Then we want to render the detaset:
2022-12-28 00:58:19 +00:00
```
$ cd data/openwebtext
$ python prepare.py
```
To download and tokenize the [openwebtext](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openwebtext) dataset. It will create a `train.bin` and `val.bin` which holds the GPT2 BPE token ids in a massive sequence. Then we're ready to kick off training. The training script currently tries to reproduce the smallest GPT-2 released by OpenAI, i.e. the 124M version of GPT-2. We can run it like so:
2022-12-28 00:58:19 +00:00
```
$ python train.py
```
Once some checkpoints are written to the output directory `out`, we're ready to sample from the model:
```
$ python sample.py
```
Training on 1 GPU overnight currently gets loss ~3.74. Random chance at init is -ln(1/50257) = 10.82. Which brings us to baselines.
## baselines
OpenAI GPT-2 checkpoints allow us to get some baselines in place for openwebtext. We can get the numbers as follows:
```
$ python train.py eval_gpt2
$ python train.py eval_gpt2_medium
$ python train.py eval_gpt2_large
$ python train.py eval_gpt2_xl
```
and observe the following losses on train and val:
| model | params | train loss | val loss |
| ------| ------ | ---------- | -------- |
| gpt2 | 124M | 3.11 | 3.12 |
| gpt2-medium | 350M | 2.85 | 2.84 |
| gpt2-large | 774M | 2.66 | 2.67 |
| gpt2-xl | 1558M | 2.56 | 2.54 |
I briefly tried finetuning gpt2 a bit more on our OWT and didn't notice dramatic improvements, suggesting that OWT is not much much different from WT in terms of the data distribution, but this needs a bit more thorough attempt once the code is in a better place.
2022-12-28 23:55:43 +00:00
## benchmarking
For model benchmarking `bench.py` might be useful. It's identical what happens in the meat of the training loop of `train.py`, but omits much of the other complexities.