Edit ‘minoteaur’
This commit is contained in:
parent
b40e1995eb
commit
4db9f7ecb4
@ -70,3 +70,7 @@ Investigate `hashbow`-type thing on page names for rainbows™. Maybe use nicer
|
||||
Many useful Minoteaur pages (maths notes, primarily) were (are) just bullet-pointed lists. They are quick to write but have some readability and organization problems. Splitting pages as I do now looks nicer, but requires me to make decisions about when to split things up and how. Hypothetical Minoteaur 9 would represent all notes as a very large tree of bullet points (parts could of course be expanded or contracted as needed). There would be no pages. However, it would be possible to assign metadata or something to bullet points. There would be no explicit links, but highlighting phrases would allow you to jump to what the system thinks is the best thing to show you (based on context (LLM or something) and position in document), or possibly just scroll through all other instances.
|
||||
|
||||
Also note: concept - probably requires more detailed edits.
|
||||
|
||||
== Minoteaur 9 concept (secret)
|
||||
|
||||
Many Minoteaur uses map quite well to nested bullet-pointed lists. It's somewhat desirable to be able to link straight to deeply nested lists, so links going to pages only is problematic. With bullet-point nesting to provide a hierarchy and links to bullet points, having separate pages at all feels inelegant. However, having to remember/copy a block ID or similar to create a link with the right target seems annoying. The "solution" to this is to make the entire notes database into a tree of bullet points and then have links take arbitrary keywords and connect to other blocks based on tree position and whether they contain the linked keyword in a subject role.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user