From 24878e5c6731f094d98ec5ab5fce71f9ca2cebd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: osmarks <osmarks@mycorrhiza>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 19:49:37 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Edit=20=E2=80=98osmarks.net=5Fweb=5Fsearch=5Fpl?=
 =?UTF-8?q?an=E2=80=99?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

---
 osmarks.net_web_search_plan.myco | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/osmarks.net_web_search_plan.myco b/osmarks.net_web_search_plan.myco
index c07cd51..f7c4dfa 100644
--- a/osmarks.net_web_search_plan.myco
+++ b/osmarks.net_web_search_plan.myco
@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ The job of a search engine is to retrieve useful information for users. This is
 * Refine query with extra detail.
 * There are several ways things can be "related" - semantically, stylistically, keywords, similar authorship (also location for images). Is there a clean way to cover all these or do we just need to have separate indices for each?
 * https://eugeneyan.com/writing/recsys-llm/
+* https://www.marginalia.nu/log/26-personalized-pagerank/
+* https://www.marginalia.nu/log/73-new-approach-to-ranking/
 
 = Cost