documentation/wrong.myco

17 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2024-07-12 07:19:08 +00:00
If you are reading this page because you have been linked to it in reference to you, it's likely because you are wrong.
2024-07-12 07:18:43 +00:00
Due to technical limitations, this page is not currently aware of the particular way in which you are wrong. However, we anticipate that it is one of the following:
* The claim you just made is contradicted by decades of research which you ignored because it does not feel good.
2024-07-12 07:20:55 +00:00
* Your statement is an incoherent jumble of vaguely associated technical terms which does not actually parse into a claim.
2024-07-12 07:27:13 +00:00
* The claim you just made is inconsistent with my reading of an obscure paper I happened to see.
2024-07-12 07:33:07 +00:00
* Your argument only works by word association and equivocation.
2024-07-12 07:36:08 +00:00
* If the claim you made were true, you could easily print money, and you haven't.
2024-07-12 07:18:43 +00:00
* You made a minor grammar error and are thus scheduled for obliteration.
2024-07-12 07:33:07 +00:00
* Your argument relates poorly defined terms in a way which makes no concrete predictions.
2024-07-12 07:20:55 +00:00
* [[gwern]] once offhandedly claimed the opposite.
2024-07-12 07:34:36 +00:00
* Your answer is right, but only because your mistakes didn't fail to cancel out.
2024-07-12 07:27:13 +00:00
* The claim you just made is contradicted by thinking about it for five seconds and basic domain knowledge.
2024-07-12 07:18:43 +00:00
* You uncritically repeated a piece of technical marketing which makes impossible or wildly implausible claims.
2024-07-12 07:19:34 +00:00
* You are trying to solve the wrong problem using the wrong methods based on a wrong model of the world derived from poor thinking and unfortunately all of your mistakes have failed to cancel out.
* A brief Fermi estimate shows that your answer is most likely off by several orders of magnitude.