documentation/wrong.myco

22 lines
2.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Permalink Normal View History

2024-07-12 07:19:08 +00:00
If you are reading this page because you have been linked to it in reference to you, it's likely because you are wrong.
2024-07-12 07:18:43 +00:00
Due to technical limitations, this page is not currently aware of the particular way in which you are wrong. However, we anticipate that it is one of the following:
2024-07-12 12:41:40 +00:00
*. The claim you just made is contradicted by decades of research which you ignored because it does not feel good.
*. Your statement is an incoherent jumble of vaguely associated technical terms which does not actually parse into a claim.
*. Your reasoning is based on a roughly accurate intuition or approximation which doesn't generalize to the edge case you just used it in.
2024-07-12 12:47:12 +00:00
*. An obscure paper I think is true disagrees with you.
2024-07-12 12:41:40 +00:00
*. Your argument could only be generated by someone with deep and abiding misunderstandings of physics, maths, reality, etc.
*. Your argument only works by word association and equivocation.
*. If the claim you made were true, you could easily print money, and you haven't.
*. You made a minor grammar error and are thus scheduled for obliteration.
*. Your argument relates poorly defined terms in a way which makes no concrete predictions.
*. [[gwern]] once offhandedly claimed the opposite.
*. Your answer is right, but only because your mistakes didn't fail to cancel out.
*. Your values are evidently antithetical to my own and you will need to be paperclipped in time.
*. The claim you just made is contradicted by thinking about it for five seconds and basic domain knowledge.
*. You uncritically repeated a piece of technical marketing which makes impossible or wildly implausible claims.
*. You are trying to solve the wrong problem using the wrong methods based on a wrong model of the world derived from poor thinking and unfortunately all of your mistakes have failed to cancel out.
*. A brief Fermi estimate shows that your answer is most likely off by several orders of magnitude.
*. The evidence for your claim is based on problematic evaluations, standards or methods of measurement and you have not sufficiently justified them.
*. Most arguments are wrong. You made an argument. Therefore, it's probably wrong.