1
0
mirror of https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5 synced 2024-11-30 05:19:57 +00:00
TiddlyWiki5/editions/tw5.com/tiddlers/widgets/CheckboxWidget.tid

131 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2014-09-10 23:06:19 +00:00
caption: checkbox
created: 20131024141900000
Checkbox widget: list and filter modes (#6561) * Docs for CheckboxWidget list and filter modes This documents the `listField` and `filter` attributes. * Tests for checkbox widget list mode * Implement checkbox list mode * WIP on implementing filter attr for checkboxes * Improve CheckboxWidget documentation * Refactor checkbox tests: move function to top The big findNodeOfType function belongs at the top of the describe block, so that the checkbox tests are more compact and easy to read. * Move checkbox widget tests to end of file The checkbox widget tests are long and involved, so we'll move them to the end of the file so they aren't a huge block of code you need to read past to find the next test. * Improve formatting of CheckboxWidget docs The \define() calls that are short enough to fit on one line should be put on one line, for readability. The ones that are quite long have been kept on multiple lines, for readability. * Added more passing tests for checkbox widget * Add some failing tests for checkbox widget The filter mode where neither checked nor unchecked is specified (in which case an empty filter result means false and a non-empty result means true) is not working yet. * Make failing tests pass * Uncomment (and improve) test for field mode We're now ready to start working on making this test pass. (There was also one small mistake in the test, which this commit corrects). * All tests now passing * No indeterminate checkboxes in simple modes The simple checkbox modes (field and index) should not produce indeterminate checkboxes. That should be reserved for the advanced modes (list and filter). * Minor improvement to unit tests * Allow indeterminate checkboxes in list and filter modes This change may require some tweaks to the unit tests to be able to test it properly. * Slightly easier to read tests * Two more tests for list mode * Greatly simplify unit test code Turns out there's no need to jump through Object.getPrototypeOf hoops. * Minor simplification of unit test * Add tests for indeterminate in list & filter modes With this, the set of tests is complete. * More tests to specify list mode behavior * Unfocus tests so all tests run * Update docs to say "new in 5.2.3" insetad of 5.2.2 * Move checkbox widget tests into their own file The test-widget.js file was getting too long with all the checkbox tests added, so we'll move the checkbox tests into their own file. * Add checkbox widget tests for index mode This commit also adds tests for index list mode (with a listIndex attribute that will parallel the listField attribute) but leaves them commented out because they don't pass yet: the code that implements the listIndex attribute hasn't been written yet). * Add listIndex attribute to checkbox widget * Remove code that lets checkboxes be indeterminate This reverts commit 6afcb151befecd3e6656c4edee7e1b2bbf529909. We will add this code back in a later PR. * Remove indeterminate tests for checkbox widget We're currently not allowing indeterminate checkboxes, so there's no need for the tests that check for them. * Document listIndex attribute of CheckboxWidget * adds class tc-checkbox-checked when checked * equivalent to #2182 (RadioWidget) * also applies `tc-checkbox` to checkboxes by default, always * Move macro definitions inside example text Since the wikitext-example-without-html macro creates a new parsing context, it's safe to have macro definitions inside it. That makes these examples a lot easier to write, and to read. * Remove all mention of indeterminate checkboxes Also improve the documentation a little bit: mention what happens in list mode if neither checked nor unchecked is specified. * Move filter mode to bottom of checkbox docs The `filter` attribute should be under both `listField` and `listIndex` rather than being between them. The documentation for filter mode should similarly be after the `listIndex` documentation. * Improve docs for `class` attr of checkbox widget This brings the wording of the `class` attribute more in line with how it's worded in the RadioWidget docs. * Fix bug with list tiddlers If neither checked nor unchecked was specified, then the behavior should be "empty = false, non-empty = true". But if *both* are specified yet neither is found, then the checkbox should be unchecked (false). It had been falling through to the "non-empty = true" behavior, which was wrong. * Improve listIndex example of checkbox widgets * Remove unused function from test-widget.js Co-authored-by: Tobias Beer <beertobias@gmail.com>
2022-04-02 14:16:08 +00:00
modified: 20220402023600000
tags: Widgets TriggeringWidgets
Checkbox widget: list and filter modes (#6561) * Docs for CheckboxWidget list and filter modes This documents the `listField` and `filter` attributes. * Tests for checkbox widget list mode * Implement checkbox list mode * WIP on implementing filter attr for checkboxes * Improve CheckboxWidget documentation * Refactor checkbox tests: move function to top The big findNodeOfType function belongs at the top of the describe block, so that the checkbox tests are more compact and easy to read. * Move checkbox widget tests to end of file The checkbox widget tests are long and involved, so we'll move them to the end of the file so they aren't a huge block of code you need to read past to find the next test. * Improve formatting of CheckboxWidget docs The \define() calls that are short enough to fit on one line should be put on one line, for readability. The ones that are quite long have been kept on multiple lines, for readability. * Added more passing tests for checkbox widget * Add some failing tests for checkbox widget The filter mode where neither checked nor unchecked is specified (in which case an empty filter result means false and a non-empty result means true) is not working yet. * Make failing tests pass * Uncomment (and improve) test for field mode We're now ready to start working on making this test pass. (There was also one small mistake in the test, which this commit corrects). * All tests now passing * No indeterminate checkboxes in simple modes The simple checkbox modes (field and index) should not produce indeterminate checkboxes. That should be reserved for the advanced modes (list and filter). * Minor improvement to unit tests * Allow indeterminate checkboxes in list and filter modes This change may require some tweaks to the unit tests to be able to test it properly. * Slightly easier to read tests * Two more tests for list mode * Greatly simplify unit test code Turns out there's no need to jump through Object.getPrototypeOf hoops. * Minor simplification of unit test * Add tests for indeterminate in list & filter modes With this, the set of tests is complete. * More tests to specify list mode behavior * Unfocus tests so all tests run * Update docs to say "new in 5.2.3" insetad of 5.2.2 * Move checkbox widget tests into their own file The test-widget.js file was getting too long with all the checkbox tests added, so we'll move the checkbox tests into their own file. * Add checkbox widget tests for index mode This commit also adds tests for index list mode (with a listIndex attribute that will parallel the listField attribute) but leaves them commented out because they don't pass yet: the code that implements the listIndex attribute hasn't been written yet). * Add listIndex attribute to checkbox widget * Remove code that lets checkboxes be indeterminate This reverts commit 6afcb151befecd3e6656c4edee7e1b2bbf529909. We will add this code back in a later PR. * Remove indeterminate tests for checkbox widget We're currently not allowing indeterminate checkboxes, so there's no need for the tests that check for them. * Document listIndex attribute of CheckboxWidget * adds class tc-checkbox-checked when checked * equivalent to #2182 (RadioWidget) * also applies `tc-checkbox` to checkboxes by default, always * Move macro definitions inside example text Since the wikitext-example-without-html macro creates a new parsing context, it's safe to have macro definitions inside it. That makes these examples a lot easier to write, and to read. * Remove all mention of indeterminate checkboxes Also improve the documentation a little bit: mention what happens in list mode if neither checked nor unchecked is specified. * Move filter mode to bottom of checkbox docs The `filter` attribute should be under both `listField` and `listIndex` rather than being between them. The documentation for filter mode should similarly be after the `listIndex` documentation. * Improve docs for `class` attr of checkbox widget This brings the wording of the `class` attribute more in line with how it's worded in the RadioWidget docs. * Fix bug with list tiddlers If neither checked nor unchecked was specified, then the behavior should be "empty = false, non-empty = true". But if *both* are specified yet neither is found, then the checkbox should be unchecked (false). It had been falling through to the "non-empty = true" behavior, which was wrong. * Improve listIndex example of checkbox widgets * Remove unused function from test-widget.js Co-authored-by: Tobias Beer <beertobias@gmail.com>
2022-04-02 14:16:08 +00:00
colors: red orange yellow blue
fruits: bananas oranges grapes
vegetables: carrots potatoes
title: CheckboxWidget
type: text/vnd.tiddlywiki
! Introduction
The checkbox widget displays an HTML `<input type="checkbox">` element that is dynamically bound to either:
* the presence or absence of a specified tag on a specified tiddler
* the value of a specified field of a specified tiddler
! Content and Attributes
The content of the `<$checkbox>` widget is displayed within an HTML `<label>` element immediately after the checkbox itself. This means that clicking on the content will toggle the checkbox.
|!Attribute |!Description |
|tiddler |Title of the tiddler to manipulate (defaults to the [[current tiddler|Current Tiddler]]) |
|tag |The name of the tag to which the checkbox is bound |
|invertTag |When set to ''yes'', flips the tag binding logic so that the absence of the tag causes the checkbox to be checked |
|field |The name of the field to which the checkbox is bound |
Checkbox widget: list and filter modes (#6561) * Docs for CheckboxWidget list and filter modes This documents the `listField` and `filter` attributes. * Tests for checkbox widget list mode * Implement checkbox list mode * WIP on implementing filter attr for checkboxes * Improve CheckboxWidget documentation * Refactor checkbox tests: move function to top The big findNodeOfType function belongs at the top of the describe block, so that the checkbox tests are more compact and easy to read. * Move checkbox widget tests to end of file The checkbox widget tests are long and involved, so we'll move them to the end of the file so they aren't a huge block of code you need to read past to find the next test. * Improve formatting of CheckboxWidget docs The \define() calls that are short enough to fit on one line should be put on one line, for readability. The ones that are quite long have been kept on multiple lines, for readability. * Added more passing tests for checkbox widget * Add some failing tests for checkbox widget The filter mode where neither checked nor unchecked is specified (in which case an empty filter result means false and a non-empty result means true) is not working yet. * Make failing tests pass * Uncomment (and improve) test for field mode We're now ready to start working on making this test pass. (There was also one small mistake in the test, which this commit corrects). * All tests now passing * No indeterminate checkboxes in simple modes The simple checkbox modes (field and index) should not produce indeterminate checkboxes. That should be reserved for the advanced modes (list and filter). * Minor improvement to unit tests * Allow indeterminate checkboxes in list and filter modes This change may require some tweaks to the unit tests to be able to test it properly. * Slightly easier to read tests * Two more tests for list mode * Greatly simplify unit test code Turns out there's no need to jump through Object.getPrototypeOf hoops. * Minor simplification of unit test * Add tests for indeterminate in list & filter modes With this, the set of tests is complete. * More tests to specify list mode behavior * Unfocus tests so all tests run * Update docs to say "new in 5.2.3" insetad of 5.2.2 * Move checkbox widget tests into their own file The test-widget.js file was getting too long with all the checkbox tests added, so we'll move the checkbox tests into their own file. * Add checkbox widget tests for index mode This commit also adds tests for index list mode (with a listIndex attribute that will parallel the listField attribute) but leaves them commented out because they don't pass yet: the code that implements the listIndex attribute hasn't been written yet). * Add listIndex attribute to checkbox widget * Remove code that lets checkboxes be indeterminate This reverts commit 6afcb151befecd3e6656c4edee7e1b2bbf529909. We will add this code back in a later PR. * Remove indeterminate tests for checkbox widget We're currently not allowing indeterminate checkboxes, so there's no need for the tests that check for them. * Document listIndex attribute of CheckboxWidget * adds class tc-checkbox-checked when checked * equivalent to #2182 (RadioWidget) * also applies `tc-checkbox` to checkboxes by default, always * Move macro definitions inside example text Since the wikitext-example-without-html macro creates a new parsing context, it's safe to have macro definitions inside it. That makes these examples a lot easier to write, and to read. * Remove all mention of indeterminate checkboxes Also improve the documentation a little bit: mention what happens in list mode if neither checked nor unchecked is specified. * Move filter mode to bottom of checkbox docs The `filter` attribute should be under both `listField` and `listIndex` rather than being between them. The documentation for filter mode should similarly be after the `listIndex` documentation. * Improve docs for `class` attr of checkbox widget This brings the wording of the `class` attribute more in line with how it's worded in the RadioWidget docs. * Fix bug with list tiddlers If neither checked nor unchecked was specified, then the behavior should be "empty = false, non-empty = true". But if *both* are specified yet neither is found, then the checkbox should be unchecked (false). It had been falling through to the "non-empty = true" behavior, which was wrong. * Improve listIndex example of checkbox widgets * Remove unused function from test-widget.js Co-authored-by: Tobias Beer <beertobias@gmail.com>
2022-04-02 14:16:08 +00:00
|listField |<<.from-version "5.2.3">> The name of the field that contains the list to which the checkbox is bound |
|index|<<.from-version "5.1.14">> The index of the //tiddler//, a [[DataTiddler|DataTiddlers]], to which the checkbox is bound<<.tip "be sure to set the //tiddler// correctly">>|
Checkbox widget: list and filter modes (#6561) * Docs for CheckboxWidget list and filter modes This documents the `listField` and `filter` attributes. * Tests for checkbox widget list mode * Implement checkbox list mode * WIP on implementing filter attr for checkboxes * Improve CheckboxWidget documentation * Refactor checkbox tests: move function to top The big findNodeOfType function belongs at the top of the describe block, so that the checkbox tests are more compact and easy to read. * Move checkbox widget tests to end of file The checkbox widget tests are long and involved, so we'll move them to the end of the file so they aren't a huge block of code you need to read past to find the next test. * Improve formatting of CheckboxWidget docs The \define() calls that are short enough to fit on one line should be put on one line, for readability. The ones that are quite long have been kept on multiple lines, for readability. * Added more passing tests for checkbox widget * Add some failing tests for checkbox widget The filter mode where neither checked nor unchecked is specified (in which case an empty filter result means false and a non-empty result means true) is not working yet. * Make failing tests pass * Uncomment (and improve) test for field mode We're now ready to start working on making this test pass. (There was also one small mistake in the test, which this commit corrects). * All tests now passing * No indeterminate checkboxes in simple modes The simple checkbox modes (field and index) should not produce indeterminate checkboxes. That should be reserved for the advanced modes (list and filter). * Minor improvement to unit tests * Allow indeterminate checkboxes in list and filter modes This change may require some tweaks to the unit tests to be able to test it properly. * Slightly easier to read tests * Two more tests for list mode * Greatly simplify unit test code Turns out there's no need to jump through Object.getPrototypeOf hoops. * Minor simplification of unit test * Add tests for indeterminate in list & filter modes With this, the set of tests is complete. * More tests to specify list mode behavior * Unfocus tests so all tests run * Update docs to say "new in 5.2.3" insetad of 5.2.2 * Move checkbox widget tests into their own file The test-widget.js file was getting too long with all the checkbox tests added, so we'll move the checkbox tests into their own file. * Add checkbox widget tests for index mode This commit also adds tests for index list mode (with a listIndex attribute that will parallel the listField attribute) but leaves them commented out because they don't pass yet: the code that implements the listIndex attribute hasn't been written yet). * Add listIndex attribute to checkbox widget * Remove code that lets checkboxes be indeterminate This reverts commit 6afcb151befecd3e6656c4edee7e1b2bbf529909. We will add this code back in a later PR. * Remove indeterminate tests for checkbox widget We're currently not allowing indeterminate checkboxes, so there's no need for the tests that check for them. * Document listIndex attribute of CheckboxWidget * adds class tc-checkbox-checked when checked * equivalent to #2182 (RadioWidget) * also applies `tc-checkbox` to checkboxes by default, always * Move macro definitions inside example text Since the wikitext-example-without-html macro creates a new parsing context, it's safe to have macro definitions inside it. That makes these examples a lot easier to write, and to read. * Remove all mention of indeterminate checkboxes Also improve the documentation a little bit: mention what happens in list mode if neither checked nor unchecked is specified. * Move filter mode to bottom of checkbox docs The `filter` attribute should be under both `listField` and `listIndex` rather than being between them. The documentation for filter mode should similarly be after the `listIndex` documentation. * Improve docs for `class` attr of checkbox widget This brings the wording of the `class` attribute more in line with how it's worded in the RadioWidget docs. * Fix bug with list tiddlers If neither checked nor unchecked was specified, then the behavior should be "empty = false, non-empty = true". But if *both* are specified yet neither is found, then the checkbox should be unchecked (false). It had been falling through to the "non-empty = true" behavior, which was wrong. * Improve listIndex example of checkbox widgets * Remove unused function from test-widget.js Co-authored-by: Tobias Beer <beertobias@gmail.com>
2022-04-02 14:16:08 +00:00
|listIndex |<<.from-version "5.2.3">> Like <<.attr index>>, but treats the value as a list the same way that <<.attr listField>> does |
|filter |<<.from-version "5.2.3">> A filter whose output determines the checked state of the checkbox |
|checked |The value of the field corresponding to the checkbox being checked |
|unchecked |The value of the field corresponding to the checkbox being unchecked |
|default |The default value to use if the field is not defined |
|indeterminate |Whether ambiguous values can produce indeterminate checkboxes (see below) |
Checkbox widget: list and filter modes (#6561) * Docs for CheckboxWidget list and filter modes This documents the `listField` and `filter` attributes. * Tests for checkbox widget list mode * Implement checkbox list mode * WIP on implementing filter attr for checkboxes * Improve CheckboxWidget documentation * Refactor checkbox tests: move function to top The big findNodeOfType function belongs at the top of the describe block, so that the checkbox tests are more compact and easy to read. * Move checkbox widget tests to end of file The checkbox widget tests are long and involved, so we'll move them to the end of the file so they aren't a huge block of code you need to read past to find the next test. * Improve formatting of CheckboxWidget docs The \define() calls that are short enough to fit on one line should be put on one line, for readability. The ones that are quite long have been kept on multiple lines, for readability. * Added more passing tests for checkbox widget * Add some failing tests for checkbox widget The filter mode where neither checked nor unchecked is specified (in which case an empty filter result means false and a non-empty result means true) is not working yet. * Make failing tests pass * Uncomment (and improve) test for field mode We're now ready to start working on making this test pass. (There was also one small mistake in the test, which this commit corrects). * All tests now passing * No indeterminate checkboxes in simple modes The simple checkbox modes (field and index) should not produce indeterminate checkboxes. That should be reserved for the advanced modes (list and filter). * Minor improvement to unit tests * Allow indeterminate checkboxes in list and filter modes This change may require some tweaks to the unit tests to be able to test it properly. * Slightly easier to read tests * Two more tests for list mode * Greatly simplify unit test code Turns out there's no need to jump through Object.getPrototypeOf hoops. * Minor simplification of unit test * Add tests for indeterminate in list & filter modes With this, the set of tests is complete. * More tests to specify list mode behavior * Unfocus tests so all tests run * Update docs to say "new in 5.2.3" insetad of 5.2.2 * Move checkbox widget tests into their own file The test-widget.js file was getting too long with all the checkbox tests added, so we'll move the checkbox tests into their own file. * Add checkbox widget tests for index mode This commit also adds tests for index list mode (with a listIndex attribute that will parallel the listField attribute) but leaves them commented out because they don't pass yet: the code that implements the listIndex attribute hasn't been written yet). * Add listIndex attribute to checkbox widget * Remove code that lets checkboxes be indeterminate This reverts commit 6afcb151befecd3e6656c4edee7e1b2bbf529909. We will add this code back in a later PR. * Remove indeterminate tests for checkbox widget We're currently not allowing indeterminate checkboxes, so there's no need for the tests that check for them. * Document listIndex attribute of CheckboxWidget * adds class tc-checkbox-checked when checked * equivalent to #2182 (RadioWidget) * also applies `tc-checkbox` to checkboxes by default, always * Move macro definitions inside example text Since the wikitext-example-without-html macro creates a new parsing context, it's safe to have macro definitions inside it. That makes these examples a lot easier to write, and to read. * Remove all mention of indeterminate checkboxes Also improve the documentation a little bit: mention what happens in list mode if neither checked nor unchecked is specified. * Move filter mode to bottom of checkbox docs The `filter` attribute should be under both `listField` and `listIndex` rather than being between them. The documentation for filter mode should similarly be after the `listIndex` documentation. * Improve docs for `class` attr of checkbox widget This brings the wording of the `class` attribute more in line with how it's worded in the RadioWidget docs. * Fix bug with list tiddlers If neither checked nor unchecked was specified, then the behavior should be "empty = false, non-empty = true". But if *both* are specified yet neither is found, then the checkbox should be unchecked (false). It had been falling through to the "non-empty = true" behavior, which was wrong. * Improve listIndex example of checkbox widgets * Remove unused function from test-widget.js Co-authored-by: Tobias Beer <beertobias@gmail.com>
2022-04-02 14:16:08 +00:00
|class |The class that will be assigned to the label element <$macrocall $name=".tip" _="""<<.from-version "5.2.3">> `tc-checkbox` is always applied by default, as well as `tc-checkbox-checked` when checked"""/> |
|actions |<<.from-version "5.1.14">> A string containing ActionWidgets to be triggered when the status of the checkbox changes (whether it is checked or unchecked) |
|uncheckactions |<<.from-version "5.1.16">> A string containing ActionWidgets to be triggered when the checkbox is unchecked |
|checkactions |<<.from-version "5.1.20">> A string containing ActionWidgets to be triggered when the checkbox is checked |
|disabled|<<.from-version "5.1.23">> Optional, disables the checkbox if set to "yes". Defaults to "no"|
!! Tag Mode
Using the checkbox widget in tag mode requires the ''tag'' attribute to specify the name of the tag. The ''tiddler'' attribute specifies the tiddler to target, defaulting to the current tiddler if not present.
This example creates a checkbox that flips the ''done'' tag on the current tiddler:
<<wikitext-example-without-html """<$checkbox tag="done"> Is it done?</$checkbox>""">>
!! Field Mode
Using the checkbox widget in field mode requires the ''field'' attribute to specify the name of the field. The ''checked'' and ''unchecked'' attributes specify the values to be assigned to the field to correspond to its checked and unchecked states respectively. The ''default'' attribute is used as a fallback value if the field is not defined.
This example creates a checkbox that is checked if the field ''status'' is equal to ''open'' and unchecked if the field is equal to ''closed''. If the field is undefined then it defaults to ''closed'', meaning that the checkbox will be unchecked if the ''status'' field is missing.
Checkbox widget: list and filter modes (#6561) * Docs for CheckboxWidget list and filter modes This documents the `listField` and `filter` attributes. * Tests for checkbox widget list mode * Implement checkbox list mode * WIP on implementing filter attr for checkboxes * Improve CheckboxWidget documentation * Refactor checkbox tests: move function to top The big findNodeOfType function belongs at the top of the describe block, so that the checkbox tests are more compact and easy to read. * Move checkbox widget tests to end of file The checkbox widget tests are long and involved, so we'll move them to the end of the file so they aren't a huge block of code you need to read past to find the next test. * Improve formatting of CheckboxWidget docs The \define() calls that are short enough to fit on one line should be put on one line, for readability. The ones that are quite long have been kept on multiple lines, for readability. * Added more passing tests for checkbox widget * Add some failing tests for checkbox widget The filter mode where neither checked nor unchecked is specified (in which case an empty filter result means false and a non-empty result means true) is not working yet. * Make failing tests pass * Uncomment (and improve) test for field mode We're now ready to start working on making this test pass. (There was also one small mistake in the test, which this commit corrects). * All tests now passing * No indeterminate checkboxes in simple modes The simple checkbox modes (field and index) should not produce indeterminate checkboxes. That should be reserved for the advanced modes (list and filter). * Minor improvement to unit tests * Allow indeterminate checkboxes in list and filter modes This change may require some tweaks to the unit tests to be able to test it properly. * Slightly easier to read tests * Two more tests for list mode * Greatly simplify unit test code Turns out there's no need to jump through Object.getPrototypeOf hoops. * Minor simplification of unit test * Add tests for indeterminate in list & filter modes With this, the set of tests is complete. * More tests to specify list mode behavior * Unfocus tests so all tests run * Update docs to say "new in 5.2.3" insetad of 5.2.2 * Move checkbox widget tests into their own file The test-widget.js file was getting too long with all the checkbox tests added, so we'll move the checkbox tests into their own file. * Add checkbox widget tests for index mode This commit also adds tests for index list mode (with a listIndex attribute that will parallel the listField attribute) but leaves them commented out because they don't pass yet: the code that implements the listIndex attribute hasn't been written yet). * Add listIndex attribute to checkbox widget * Remove code that lets checkboxes be indeterminate This reverts commit 6afcb151befecd3e6656c4edee7e1b2bbf529909. We will add this code back in a later PR. * Remove indeterminate tests for checkbox widget We're currently not allowing indeterminate checkboxes, so there's no need for the tests that check for them. * Document listIndex attribute of CheckboxWidget * adds class tc-checkbox-checked when checked * equivalent to #2182 (RadioWidget) * also applies `tc-checkbox` to checkboxes by default, always * Move macro definitions inside example text Since the wikitext-example-without-html macro creates a new parsing context, it's safe to have macro definitions inside it. That makes these examples a lot easier to write, and to read. * Remove all mention of indeterminate checkboxes Also improve the documentation a little bit: mention what happens in list mode if neither checked nor unchecked is specified. * Move filter mode to bottom of checkbox docs The `filter` attribute should be under both `listField` and `listIndex` rather than being between them. The documentation for filter mode should similarly be after the `listIndex` documentation. * Improve docs for `class` attr of checkbox widget This brings the wording of the `class` attribute more in line with how it's worded in the RadioWidget docs. * Fix bug with list tiddlers If neither checked nor unchecked was specified, then the behavior should be "empty = false, non-empty = true". But if *both* are specified yet neither is found, then the checkbox should be unchecked (false). It had been falling through to the "non-empty = true" behavior, which was wrong. * Improve listIndex example of checkbox widgets * Remove unused function from test-widget.js Co-authored-by: Tobias Beer <beertobias@gmail.com>
2022-04-02 14:16:08 +00:00
<<wikitext-example-without-html """<$checkbox field="status" checked="open" unchecked="closed" default="closed"> Is it open?</$checkbox><br />''status:'' {{!!status}}""">>
!! List Mode
Using the checkbox widget in list mode requires the ''listField'' attribute to specify the name of a field containing a list. The ''checked'' attribute specifies the value that should be present or absent in the list when the checkbox is checked or unchecked respectively. If ''checked'' is absent (or empty) but ''unchecked'' is present, then the logic will be inverted: the checkbox will be checked when the "unchecked" value is missing from the list, and unchecked when the "unchecked" value is found in the list. If both ''checked'' and ''unchecked'' are present, the checkbox will work like a toggle, replacing the ''checked'' value with the ''unchecked'' value and vice-versa. Finally, if neither ''checked'' nor ''unchecked'' is specified, the checkbox will be checked if the field has anything in it, but unchecked if the field is missing or empty. (This is rarely useful; most of the time you'll want to specify ''checked'' or ''unchecked'' or both.)
The ''default'' attribute is used as a fallback for the checkbox state if the field is not defined.
This example creates a checkbox that is checked if the list field named ''colors'' contains ''green'' and unchecked if the field contains ''red''. If the field is undefined, or if neither ''green'' nor ''red'' appears in the field, then it defaults to ''green'', meaning that the checkbox will be checked.
<<wikitext-example-without-html """<$checkbox listField="colors" checked="green" unchecked="red" default="green"> Is it green?</$checkbox><br />''colors:'' {{!!colors}}""">>
Try editing the ''colors'' field of this tiddler to see how the example changes.
!! Index Mode
To use the checkbox widget in index mode set the ''index'' attribute to the index of a [[DataTiddler|DataTiddlers]]. The ''checked'' and ''unchecked'' attributes specify the values to be assigned to the index and correspond to its checked and unchecked states respectively. The ''default'' attribute is used as a fallback value if the index is undefined.
The example below creates a checkbox that is checked if the index by the name of this tiddler in the tiddler ExampleData is equal to ''selected'' and unchecked if the index is an empty string. If the index is undefined then it defaults to an empty string, meaning the checkbox will be unchecked if the index is missing.
<$macrocall $name="wikitext-example-without-html" src="""<$checkbox tiddler="ExampleData" index=<<currentTiddler>> checked="selected" unchecked="" default=""> Selected?</$checkbox>"""/>
Checkbox widget: list and filter modes (#6561) * Docs for CheckboxWidget list and filter modes This documents the `listField` and `filter` attributes. * Tests for checkbox widget list mode * Implement checkbox list mode * WIP on implementing filter attr for checkboxes * Improve CheckboxWidget documentation * Refactor checkbox tests: move function to top The big findNodeOfType function belongs at the top of the describe block, so that the checkbox tests are more compact and easy to read. * Move checkbox widget tests to end of file The checkbox widget tests are long and involved, so we'll move them to the end of the file so they aren't a huge block of code you need to read past to find the next test. * Improve formatting of CheckboxWidget docs The \define() calls that are short enough to fit on one line should be put on one line, for readability. The ones that are quite long have been kept on multiple lines, for readability. * Added more passing tests for checkbox widget * Add some failing tests for checkbox widget The filter mode where neither checked nor unchecked is specified (in which case an empty filter result means false and a non-empty result means true) is not working yet. * Make failing tests pass * Uncomment (and improve) test for field mode We're now ready to start working on making this test pass. (There was also one small mistake in the test, which this commit corrects). * All tests now passing * No indeterminate checkboxes in simple modes The simple checkbox modes (field and index) should not produce indeterminate checkboxes. That should be reserved for the advanced modes (list and filter). * Minor improvement to unit tests * Allow indeterminate checkboxes in list and filter modes This change may require some tweaks to the unit tests to be able to test it properly. * Slightly easier to read tests * Two more tests for list mode * Greatly simplify unit test code Turns out there's no need to jump through Object.getPrototypeOf hoops. * Minor simplification of unit test * Add tests for indeterminate in list & filter modes With this, the set of tests is complete. * More tests to specify list mode behavior * Unfocus tests so all tests run * Update docs to say "new in 5.2.3" insetad of 5.2.2 * Move checkbox widget tests into their own file The test-widget.js file was getting too long with all the checkbox tests added, so we'll move the checkbox tests into their own file. * Add checkbox widget tests for index mode This commit also adds tests for index list mode (with a listIndex attribute that will parallel the listField attribute) but leaves them commented out because they don't pass yet: the code that implements the listIndex attribute hasn't been written yet). * Add listIndex attribute to checkbox widget * Remove code that lets checkboxes be indeterminate This reverts commit 6afcb151befecd3e6656c4edee7e1b2bbf529909. We will add this code back in a later PR. * Remove indeterminate tests for checkbox widget We're currently not allowing indeterminate checkboxes, so there's no need for the tests that check for them. * Document listIndex attribute of CheckboxWidget * adds class tc-checkbox-checked when checked * equivalent to #2182 (RadioWidget) * also applies `tc-checkbox` to checkboxes by default, always * Move macro definitions inside example text Since the wikitext-example-without-html macro creates a new parsing context, it's safe to have macro definitions inside it. That makes these examples a lot easier to write, and to read. * Remove all mention of indeterminate checkboxes Also improve the documentation a little bit: mention what happens in list mode if neither checked nor unchecked is specified. * Move filter mode to bottom of checkbox docs The `filter` attribute should be under both `listField` and `listIndex` rather than being between them. The documentation for filter mode should similarly be after the `listIndex` documentation. * Improve docs for `class` attr of checkbox widget This brings the wording of the `class` attribute more in line with how it's worded in the RadioWidget docs. * Fix bug with list tiddlers If neither checked nor unchecked was specified, then the behavior should be "empty = false, non-empty = true". But if *both* are specified yet neither is found, then the checkbox should be unchecked (false). It had been falling through to the "non-empty = true" behavior, which was wrong. * Improve listIndex example of checkbox widgets * Remove unused function from test-widget.js Co-authored-by: Tobias Beer <beertobias@gmail.com>
2022-04-02 14:16:08 +00:00
!! Index List Mode
Using the checkbox widget in index list mode requires the ''listIndex'' attribute to specify the the index of a [[DataTiddler|DataTiddlers]] containing a list. The ''checked'' attribute specifies the value that should be present or absent in the list when the checkbox is checked or unchecked respectively. If ''checked'' is absent (or empty) but ''unchecked'' is present, then the logic will be inverted: the checkbox will be checked when the "unchecked" value is missing from the list, and unchecked when the "unchecked" value is found in the list. If both ''checked'' and ''unchecked'' are present, the checkbox will work like a toggle, replacing the ''checked'' value with the ''unchecked'' value and vice-versa. Finally, if neither ''checked'' nor ''unchecked'' is specified, the checkbox will be checked if the field has anything in it, but unchecked if the field is missing or empty. (This is rarely useful; most of the time you'll want to specify ''checked'' or ''unchecked'' or both.)
The ''default'' attribute is used as a fallback for the checkbox state if the index is undefined.
The example below creates three checkboxes that each control a different value in an index field of the ExampleData tiddler.
<$macrocall $name="wikitext-example-without-html" src="""
<$set name=indexName filter="[<currentTiddler>addsuffix[ Colors]]" >
<$checkbox tiddler="ExampleData" listIndex=<<indexName>> checked="green" unchecked="red" default="red"> Green or red?</$checkbox> <br/>
<$checkbox tiddler="ExampleData" listIndex=<<indexName>> checked="yellow" unchecked="blue" default="blue"> Yellow or blue?</$checkbox> <br/>
<$checkbox tiddler="ExampleData" listIndex=<<indexName>> checked="orange" unchecked="purple" default="purple"> Orange or purple?</$checkbox> <br />
Colors list: {{{ [[ExampleData]getindex<indexName>] }}}
</$set>
"""/>
!! Filter Mode
Using the checkbox widget in filter mode requires the ''filter'' attribute to contain a filter whose output will determine the checked state of the checkbox. In filter mode, checking the checkbox will not automatically make changes to any field of any tiddler. Instead, you can use the ''actions'' attribute (or ''checkactions'' and ''uncheckactions'') to specify what should happen when the checkbox is toggled. It is your responsibility to make sure the actions cause changes to the tiddlers or fields that the filter results depend on, so that the checkbox becomes properly checked or unchecked after the actions have triggered.
If the filter returns an empty result, the checkbox will be unchecked. Otherwise, if the filter result is non-empty, the checkbox will be checked. However, if either the ''checked'' or ''unchecked'' attributes (or both) are specified, then their values will be looked for in the filter result, instead of considering any non-empty value to mean "checked".
This example creates the same checkbox as in the list mode example, selecting between ''red'' and ''green'' in the ''colors'' list field, but using filters and actions to make the change.
<<wikitext-example-without-html """\define checkActions() <$action-listops $field="colors" $subfilter="-red green"/>
\define uncheckActions() <$action-listops $field="colors" $subfilter="red -green"/>
<$checkbox filter="[list[!!colors]]" checked="green" unchecked="red" default="red" checkactions=<<checkActions>> uncheckactions=<<uncheckActions>> > Is "green" in colors?</$checkbox><br />''colors:'' {{!!colors}}
""">>
!! Indeterminate checkboxes
If both the ''checked'' and ''unchecked'' attributes are specified, but neither one is found in the specified field (or index), the result can be ambiguous. Should the checkbox be checked or unchecked? Normally in such cases the checkbox will be unchecked, but if the ''indeterminate'' attribute is set to "yes" (default is "no"), the checkbox will instead be in an "indeterminate" state. An indeterminate checkbox counts as false for most purposes &mdash; if you click it, the checkbox will become checked and the ''checkactions'', if any, will be triggered &mdash; but indeterminate checkboxes are displayed differently in the browser.
This example shows indeterminate checkboxes being used for categories in a shopping list (which could also be sub-tasks in a todo list, or many other things). If only some items in a category are selected, the category checkbox is indeterminate. You can click on the category checkboxes to see how indeterminate states are treated the same as the unchecked state, and clicking the box checks it and applies its check actions (in this case, checking all the boxes in that category). Try editing the <<.field fruits>> and <<.field vegetables>> fields on this tiddler and see what happens to the example when you do.
<<wikitext-example-without-html """\define check-all(field-name:"items") <$action-listops $field="selected-$field-name$" $filter="[list[!!$field-name$]]" />
\define uncheck-all(field-name:"items") <$action-listops $field="selected-$field-name$" $filter="[[]]" />
<$checkbox filter="[list[!!selected-fruits]count[]]" checked={{{ [list[!!fruits]count[]] }}} unchecked="0" checkactions=<<check-all fruits>> uncheckactions=<<uncheck-all fruits>> indeterminate="yes"> fruits</$checkbox>
<ul style="list-style: none">
<$list variable="fruit" filter="[list[!!fruits]]">
<li><$checkbox listField="selected-fruits" checked=<<fruit>>> <<fruit>></$checkbox></li>
</$list>
</ul>
<$checkbox filter="[list[!!selected-vegetables]count[]]" checked={{{ [list[!!vegetables]count[]] }}} unchecked="0" checkactions=<<check-all vegetables>> uncheckactions=<<uncheck-all vegetables>> indeterminate="yes"> veggies</$checkbox>
<ul style="list-style: none">
<$list variable="veggie" filter="[list[!!vegetables]]">
<li><$checkbox listField="selected-vegetables" checked=<<veggie>>> <<veggie>></$checkbox></li>
</$list>
</ul>
<p>Selected veggies: {{!!selected-vegetables}}<br/>
Selected fruits: {{!!selected-fruits}}</p>""">>